ABSTRACT
Introduction: Combination of daratumumab (Dara) and lenalidomide (Len) may enhance the function of teclistamab (Tec), potentially resulting in improved antimyeloma activity in a broader population. We present initial safety and efficacy data of Tec-Dara- Len combination in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in a phase 1b study (MajesTEC-2;NCT04722146). Method(s): Eligible patients who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), including a proteasome inhibitor and immune-modulatory drug, were given weekly doses of Tec (0.72-or- 1.5 mg/kg with step-up dosing) + Dara 1800 mg + Len 25 mg. Responses per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, adverse events (Aes) per CTCAE v5.0, and for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) per ASTCT guidelines, were assessed. Result(s): 32 patients received Tec-Dara- Len (0.72 mg/kg, n = 13;1.5 mg/kg, n = 19). At data cut-off (11 July 2022), median follow-up (range) was 5.78 months (1.0-10.4) and median treatment duration was 4.98 months (0.10-10.35). Median age was 62 years (38-75);87.5% were male. Median prior LOT was 2 (1-3), 18.8% were refractory to Dara and 28.1% refractory to Len. CRS was most frequent AE (81.3% [n = 26], all grade 1/2), 95% occurred during cycle1. Median time to onset was 2 days (1-8), median duration was 2 days (1-22). No ICANS were reported. Frequent Aes (>=25.0% across both dose levels) were neutropenia (75.0% [n = 24];grade 3/4: 68.8% [n = 22]), fatigue (43.8% [n = 14];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]), diarrhoea (37.5% [n = 12];all grade 1/2), insomnia (31.3% [n = 10];grade 3/4: 3.1% [n = 1]), cough (28.1% [n = 9];all grade 1/2), hypophosphatemia (25.0% [n = 8];all grade 1/2), and pyrexia (25% [n = 8];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]). Febrile neutropenia frequency was 12.5% (n = 4). Infections occurred in 24 patients (75.0%;grade 3/4: 28.1% [n = 9]). Most common were upper respiratory infection (21.9% [n = 7]), COVID-19 (21.9% [n = 7]), and pneumonia (21.9% [n = 7]). Three (9.4%) had COVID-19 pneumonia. One (3.1%) discontinued due to COVID-19 infection and this patient subsequently died of this infection. Overall response rate (ORR, median follow-up) was 13/13 (8.61 months) at 0.72 mg/kg and 13/16 evaluable patients (less mature at 4.17 months) at 1.5 mg/kg. 12 patients attained very good/better partial response at 0.72 mg/kg dose, and response was not mature for 1.5 mg/kg group. Median time to first response was 1.0 month (0.7-2.0). Preliminary pharmacokinetic concentrations of Tec-Dara- Len were similar as seen with Tec monotherapy. Tec-Dara- Len- treatment led to proinflammatory cytokine production and T-cell activation. Conclusion(s): The combination of Tec-Dara- Len has no new safety signals beyond those seen with Tec or Dara-Len individually. Promising ORR supports the potential for this combination to have enhanced early disease control through the addition of Tec. These data warrant further investigation.
ABSTRACT
In phase 1 of CC-92480- MM- 001 (NCT03374085), the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of mezigdomide plus dexamethasone (MEZI-d) was selected at 1 mg once daily for 21/28 days. Here we report preliminary results from the MEZI-d dose-expansion cohort in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM. Key eligibility criteria were: RRMM;>=3 prior lines of therapy;disease progression <=60 days of last myeloma therapy;refractoriness to lenalidomide/pomalidomide, a proteasome inhibitor, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Oral mezigdomide 1 mg was given on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle, plus weekly dexamethasone (40 mg;20 mg if >75 years of age). Primary objective was to evaluate efficacy (overall response rate [ORR]);secondary objectives included safety/tolerability and additional efficacy assessments. Pharmacodynamics was an exploratory objective. As of 16/Sep/2022, 101 patients had received MEZI-d at the RP2D. Median age was 67 (range 42-85) years, median time since initial diagnosis was 7.4 (1.1-37.0) years;39.6% of patients had plasmacytomas and 37/101 patients had high-risk cytogenetics (56/101 not evaluable). Median number of prior regimens was 6 (3-15);prior therapies included stem cell transplantation (77.2%) and anti-BCMA therapy (29.7%). All patients were refractory to last myeloma regimen and triple-class refractory. Median follow-up was 7.5 (0.5-21.9) months, with a median of 4 (1-20) cycles;10.0% of patients continued treatment;progressive disease was the main reason for discontinuation (60.4%). ORR was 40.6% for all patients. Whilst data are not mature yet, median PFS was 4.4 (95% CI 3.0-5.5) months and median duration of response was 7.6 (95% CI 5.4-9.5) months. ORR was 30.0% in patients with plasmacytomas (N = 40) and 50.0% in patients with prior anti-BCMA therapy (N = 30). Ninety-one (91.1%) patients experienced a grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most frequent hematologic grade 3/4 TEAEs were neutropenia (75.2%), anaemia (35.6%), and thrombocytopenia (27.7%);34.7% of patients had grade 3/4 infections, including grade 3/4 pneumonia (15.8%) and COVID-19 (7.0%). Occurrence of other grade 3/4 non-hematologic TEAEs was generally low. Due to TEAEs, 76.2% and 29.7% of patients had mezigdomide dose interruptions and reductions, respectively;90.1% of patients discontinued mezigdomide. Mezigdomide induced substrate degradation and increases in activated and proliferating T cells in patients, including those directly refractory to pomalidomide-based therapies. MEZI-d had a manageable safety profile with encouraging efficacy in patients with triple-class refractory RRMM, including patients with prior BCMA-targeted therapies. These results strongly support the continued development of mezigdomide in MM, and especially in combination.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Despite several studies, the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on patients with multiple myeloma remains uncertain. Material(s) and Method(s): We performed a survey that covered the period of the first and second waves of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in 23 centers inseven countries. Out of 352 patients with myeloma and SARS-CoV-2, 23% died. Results/Conclusions: Logistic regression showed a lower risk of death among patients treated with proteasome inhibitor and a higher risk of death for those who had a severe or a very severe course of disease.Copyright © 2023 Sciendo. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) proteins play an important role in multiple myeloma (MM) cell survival and represent an attractive therapeutic target. In prior trials, a subgroup analysis of patients with t(11;14)-positive relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM showed the combination of a Bcl-2 inhibitor, a proteasome inhibitor, and dexamethasone improved progression-free survival with no increased mortality. BGB-11417, a Bcl-2 inhibitor, is more potent and selective than venetoclax. BGB-11417- 105 (NCT04973605) is a phase 1b/2 study assessing the safety and efficacy of BGB-11417 monotherapy, in combination with dexamethasone, or with dexamethasone+carfilzomib in patients with t(11;14)-positive R/R MM. Preliminary safety results for the combination of BGB-11417 + dexamethasone are presented. Method(s): Eligible patients had t(11;14)-positive R/R MM and had been exposed to a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory agent, and anti-CD38 therapy. Patients received 80-, 160-, 320-, or 640-mg BGB-11417 daily with 40-mg dexamethasone weekly until death, intolerability, or disease progression. Dose escalation was guided by a mTPI-2 design and overall review by a safety monitoring committee. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were also assessed. Result(s): As of 1 July 2022, 10 patients were enrolled in the 80-, 160-, and 320-mg (3 patients each) and 640-mg (1 patient) dose-escalation cohorts of BGB-11417 + dexamethasone. The median age was 69 years (range, 52-81) and median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 1-5). The median treatment duration was 3.2 months (range, 0.5-6.5). No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity at any dose level. Three patients died whilst on study: 1 due to COVID-19 complications 157 days after treatment discontinuation (day 208), 1 due to progressive disease 50 days after treatment discontinuation (day 89), and 1 due to COVID-19 whilst on study treatment (day 78). No deaths were associated with study treatment. Two patients experienced Grade >= 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). One patient in the 160-mg cohort experienced Grade 3 increase in liver enzymes and lymphopenia. One patient in the 320-mg cohort experienced Grade 3 lymphopenia. The most common TEAEs were insomnia (50%), fatigue (30%), arthralgia (20%), back pain (20%), lymphopenia (20%), and nausea (20%). BGB-11417 exposure increased dose-dependently from 80 mg to 320 mg with high interpatient PK variability. BGB-11417 exposures after single and multiple doses appeared similar, indicating limited accumulation. Conclusion(s): BGB-11417 plus dexamethasone was generally well-tolerated in patients with R/R MM harbouring t(11;14) at doses <=640 mg. Efficacy data are forthcoming. Recruitment is ongoing in the US, Australia, and New Zealand;the BGB-11417, dexamethasone, and carfilzomib combination arm will open in the future.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) is a phase 2, multicohort study evaluating cilta-cel, an anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy, in several multiple myeloma (MM) patient (pt) populations. Objective(s): To report updated results with longer follow-up on cohort C pts with previous exposure to a non-cellular anti- BCMA immunotherapy. Method(s): Cohort C pts had progressive MM after treatment (tx) with a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, anti-CD38 antibody, and non-cellular BCMA-targeting agent. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75x106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was administered 5-7 days post lymphodepletion. Primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and adverse events (AEs). Result(s): As of June 1, 2022, 20 pts (13 ADC exposed;7 BsAb exposed) were treated with cilta-cel;4 pts did not receive cilta-cel due to either low cellular yield (n=2, 1 in each group) or death due to progressive disease (PD) prior to dosing (n=2, 1 in each group) and 6 pts received anti-BCMA tx as their last line of therapy (n=4 ADC, n=2 BsAb). During prior anti-BCMA tx, best responses included VGPR (ADC: 2 pts;BsAb: 1 pt), sCR (ADC: 1 pt), and CR (BsAb: 1 pt);the rest had best response of stable disease or PD (1 pt not evaluable). Baseline characteristics are presented in Figure 1A. Median time from last anti- BCMA agent to cilta-cel infusion was 195 d;median administered dose of cilta-cel was 0.65x106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg. At a median follow-up of 18.0 mo, 7/10 evaluable pts (70%) were MRD negative at 10-5 (ADC: 5/7 [71.4%], BsAb: 2/3 [66.7%]). ORR: full cohort, 60%;ADC, 61.5%;BsAb, 57.1% (Figure 1B). Median DOR: full cohort, 12.8 mo;ADC, 12.8 mo;BsAb, 8.2 mo. Median PFS: full cohort, 9.1 mo;ADC, 9.5 mo;BsAb, 5.3 mo. Cilta-cel responders had a shorter median duration of last anti- BCMA agent exposure (29.5 d) compared with non-responders (63.5 d). Responders also had a longer median time from last anti-BCMA tx exposure to apheresis (161.0 d) than non-responders (56.5 d). Most common AEs were hematologic. CRS: n=12 (60%;all Gr1/2), median time to onset 7.5 d, median duration 6.0 d. ICANS: n=4 (20%, 2 Gr3/4), median time to onset 9.0 d, median duration 7.0 d. No patient had movement or neurocognitive tx emergent AE/parkinsonism. There were 12 deaths (PD: 8;COVID-19 pneumonia: 2 [not tx related];subarachnoid hemorrhage: 1 [not tx related];C. difficile colitis: 1 [tx related]). (Figure Presented)(Figure Presented)Conclusions: Pts with heavily pretreated MM and previous exposure to a non-cellular anti-BCMA therapy had favorable responses to cilta-cel. However, depth and DOR appear lower than that seen in anti-BCMA-naive pts treated with cilta-cel (at 27.7 mo, median DOR was not reached in heavily pre-treated but anti-BCMA naive CARTITUDE-1 pts). These data may inform tx plans, including sequencing and washout period between BCMA-targeting agentsCopyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
The treatment of choice for extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) is radiotherapy (RT). It is under discussion whether the management of an anaplastic form of EMP requires the addition of systemic therapy. We present a case of a 66-year-old male who was diagnosed with anaplastic plasmacytoma of the maxillary sinus. After the exclusion of multiple myeloma, Dara-VMP (daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisolone) regimen was initiated. During the third cycle of Dara-VMP, a progression of the tumor was observed. RT and BRd (bendamustine, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide) regimen were initiated. After 4 cycles of BRd, disease progression was established. KRd (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen was initiated. The first cycle of KRd was not completed, as the patient was diagnosed with COVID-19. After the infection, the progression of EMP was observed. In this case, the anaplastic EMP was resistant to RT and chemotherapy regimens with novel agents, including a monoclonal antibody, an immunomodulatory drug, and proteasome inhibitors. Copyright © 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.
ABSTRACT
Background: Lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance and continuous LEN-based induction therapy until disease progression have become standard of care for frontline therapy of multiple myeloma (MM). As such, an increasing number of patients (pts) in need of 2nd line therapy have LEN-refractory disease. Optimal treatment in this setting has not been rigorously assessed in randomized studies. The phase I portion of Alliance A061202 demonstrated the safety of the ixazomib-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (IXA-POM-DEX) combination for the treatment of pts with LEN and proteasome inhibitor (PI)-refractory MM. Aims: In the randomized phase II portion, we evaluated the addition of IXA to POM-DEX for PI naïve / sensitive pts progressing on LEN as part of 1st line therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), depth of response, survival and safety. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to IXA-POM-DEX or POM-DEX and stratified by prior bortezomib exposure, International Staging System stage (1 and 2 vs 3) and the presence of high-risk cytogenetics. POM was administered at 4 mg on days 1-21;IXA 4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15;and DEX 20 mg (>75 years (yrs)) or 40 mg (≤75 yrs) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression, the emergence of unacceptable side effects or withdrawal of treatment consent. Results: 38 and 39 eligible pts were assigned to IXA-POM-DEX and POM-DEX, respectively. The median age was 66 yrs (range 41-83) and 64 yrs (range 52-85). A planned first interim analysis was conducted after 43 out of 57 required events had occurred. PFS favored the IXA-POM-DEX arm (one-sided log rank test value = 4.6345, p=0.03134 [< p-value boundary of 0.058]), yielding a hazard ratio of 0.528 (upper 90% bound = 0.777). A stratified log-rank test found that PFS was superior for the triplet after adjusting for stratification factors (one-sided stratified log rank test value = 5.8371;p=0.0157), adjusted hazard ratio 0.451 (upper 90% bound = 0.694). The ORR favored IXA-POM-DEX (63.2% vs 43.6%, p=0.0853), and the ≥very good partial response was 26.3% vs 5.1%, respectively (p=0.01). The clinical benefit rate (ORR + minimal response rate) was 73.7% and 56.4%. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included lymphopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and fatigue in 40%, 37%, 16% and 16% of IXAPOM-DEX-treated pts and 26%, 21%, 13%, and 15% of POM-DEX-treated pts. Therapy was discontinued for disease progression in 47.4% of pts on IXA-POM-DEX and 76.9% of pts on POM-DEX and for adverse events in 7.9% and 7.7% of pts, respectively. Summary/Conclusion: The addition of IXA to the POM-DEX backbone improved the depth of response and PFS for pts relapsing on LEN as part of 1st line therapy. Hematologic toxicity was increased with the addition of IXA, but side effects were manageable. The ease of administration of this all-oral combination allowed for safer, uninterrupted treatment during the COVID pandemic. Our results should be confirmed in phase III trials but lend support for this regimen as part of 2nd line therapy for this patient population.
ABSTRACT
Background: Systemic AL amyloidosis is an incurable relapsing plasma cell disorder. Despite therapeutic advances, there are no approved treatments for relapse disease. Treatment is often challenging due to underlying organ dysfunction. Belantamab mafodotin is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting B-cell maturation antigen with approval for relapsed refractory myeloma. In multiply pre-treated myeloma, the DREAMM-2 phase II trial showed an overall response rate of 32% for those with 2.5 mg/kg dose administered every three weeks with 2/3rd patients reporting keratopathy. A small case series of 6 patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis (Zhang et al , ASH 2021) was recently reported and a phase 2 trial is recruiting for patients with refractory amyloidosis (NCT04617925). Aims: We report our initial results using Belantamab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with AL amyloidosis with relapsed disease. Methods: Data for consecutive patients who were administered Belantamab at a specialist referral centre, National Amyloidosis Centre, University College London, was analysed. Results: Eleven patients were included 8 male, 3 female. Median age at Belantamab initiation was 65 (range 42-74) years. Eight patients had λ AL-type and three κ AL-type. At diagnosis, median involved free light-chain concentration was 534 (range 73-7181) mg/l. A median of two organs involved at baseline (range 1-3): 4 had cardiac involvement (half Mayo stage 2;half Mayo stage 3a) and 8 had renal involvement. The median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 2-5) with all exposed to prior immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors and 73% to anti-CD38 antibody treatments. Thirty-six percent had relapsed after melphalan-conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation. A median of 3 cycles of belantamab were delivered (range 1-8). The most frequent adverse event was ocular toxicity which was experienced in 8 patients (grade 1-3), necessitating dose modification of the three-weekly schedule. One patient developed transient grade 1 dyspnoea and liver dysfunction. No patients developed cytopenias, unlike previous reports (Zhang et al , 2021), nor infections beyond COVID (2 patients mild with no hospital admissions). The majority of the cohort required dose reduction either at initiation (patient 4, due to end stage renal failure;patient 11, post-renal transplant) or during therapy (n=5;three to 1.9mg/kg, two to 1.25mg/kg) due to ocular toxicity. Only one patient remained on the standard dose of 2.5mg/kg for >3 cycles. Ocular toxicity improved after treatment interruption (drug intervals 4-6 weeks) and no patients required complete treatment cessation. One patient is too early to assess response. Haematological responses (PR or better) were seen in 7 patients with 3 complete responses and two very good partial responses (VGPR) which are ongoing. Both renal patients (patients 4 and 11) commenced a dose of 1.25mg/kg and sustained a VGPR with no additional toxicity. Patient 3 had a 42% reduction in sFLC after two doses but then a prolonged gap due to keratopathy and has lost the response. There were no cardiac or renal toxicities observed. Summary/Conclusion: Belantamab mafodotin demonstrates significant activity in patients with heavily pre-treated AL amyloidosis with 70% achieving a ≥PR. Apart from keratopathy requiring dose modification, no other substantial toxicity was observed. Two patients with renal impairment (stage V CKD and ESRD) and one patient post-renal transplant tolerated treatment with no additional toxicity. Belantamab mafodotin shows promise in treatment of relapsed AL and needs further prospective trials.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cohort A of the multicohort phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) study is assessing ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT) and were refractory to lenalidomide (len). This population is difficult to treat and has poor prognosis. Aims: To present updated results from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A. Methods: All patients provided informed consent. Eligible patients had progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT that included a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD). Patients were len-refractory and had no prior exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. Patients received a single cilta-cel infusion (target dose: 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) after lymphodepletion. Cilta-cel safety and efficacy were assessed. The primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5 by next generation sequencing. Patient management strategies were used to reduce the risk of movement and neurocognitive adverse events (MNTs). Other assessments included pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses (Cmax and Tmax of CAR+ T-cell transgene levels in blood), levels of cytokine release syndrome (CRS)-related cytokines (e.g., IL-6) over time, peak levels of cytokines by response and CRS, association of cytokine levels with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and CAR+ T cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response, CRS, and ICANS. Results: As of January 2022 (median follow-up: 17.1 months [range: 3.3-23.1]), cilta-cel was administered to 20 patients (male: 65%;median age: 60 years [range: 38-75]). Median number of prior LOT was 2 (range: 1-3);median time since MM diagnosis was 3.5 years (range: 0.7-8.0). 95% of patients were refractory to their last LOT;40% were triple-class refractory. Overall response rate was 95%, with 90% of patients achieving ≥complete response and 95% achieving ≥very good partial response. Median time to first response was 1.0 month (range: 0.7-3.3);median time to best response was 2.6 months (range: 0.9-13.6). All MRD-evaluable patients (n=16) achieved MRD negativity at 10-5. Median duration of response was not reached. The 12-month progression-free survival rate was 75% and the 12-month event-free rate was 79%. CRS occurred in 95% of patients (grade 3/4: 10%), with a median time to onset of 7 days (range: 5-9) and median duration of 3 days (range: 2-12). 30% of patients had neurotoxicity (5 grade 1/2 and 1 grade 3/4). ICANS occurred in 3 patients (15%;all grade 1/2);1 patient had facial paralysis (grade 2). No MNTs were observed. 1 death due to COVID-19 occurred and was assessed as treatment-related by the investigator;2 deaths due to progressive disease and 1 due to sepsis (not related to treatment) also occurred. Based on preliminary PK analyses of CAR transgene by qPCR, peak expansion of CAR-T cells occurred at day 10.5 (range: 8.7-42.9);median persistence was 153.5 days (range: 57.1-336.8). Summary/Conclusion: A single cilta-cel infusion led to deepening and durable responses at this longer follow-up (median 17.1 months) in patients with MM who had 1-3 prior LOT and were len-refractory. Follow-up is ongoing. We will present updated and detailed PK, cytokine, and CAR-T subset analyses as well as clinical correlation to provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy and safety in this difficult-to-treat patient population, which is being further evaluated in the CARTITUDE-4 study (NCT04181827;enrollment concluded).
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with hematologic malignancies have a lower vaccine response and higher rates for SARS CoV-2 morbidity and mortality. We present preliminary data focusing on humoral vaccine responses and correlates with disease subtype and treatment exposure. Methods: We analyzed data from 332 patients with a hematologic malignancy from May 1, 2021 - Jan 31, 2022 who received SARSCoV-2 vaccination and performed a prospective cohort serologic study with the Elecsys®Anti-SARSCoV-2-S test. Patients received homologous or heterologous vaccine combination of BNT162b2, mRNA1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and/or Ad26.COV2.S. Blood samples were obtained before any vaccination, 2-6 weeks after the second vaccine (2V), before third vaccine (3V), and 2-6 weeks after 3V. Results: The median age was 67 years (range 18-91years) with 41.9% female. At 2V, 11.5% and at 3V, 23.8% received heterologous vaccines. Treatment status at first vaccine dose significantly affected peak 2V antibody response (p < 0.05). Seropositive rate and median antibody titer after 2V for previously untreated patients were higher compared to patients on active therapy or had previously been treated. Treatment naïve (n = 60;seropositivity 85.1%;median titer 1306 U/mL;[Q1-Q3:11.4-> 2499]);first-line (1L) active therapy (n = 127;65.4%;41.25 U/mL;[ < 0.8-592.5]);second-line and beyond (2L+) active therapy (n = 56;60.7%;2.6U/mL;[ < 0.8-154]);previous treatment with 1L (n = 66;64.8%;118 U/mL;[ < 0.8-> 2499]);previous treatment with 2L+ (n = 23;59.1%;4U/mL;[ < 0.8-229.5]). Of 61 patients that were seronegative at 2V, 17 (27.9%) seroconverted after 3V. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) containing therapy as the most recent treatment from 2V had the greatest impact on humoral response. Exposure to anti-CD20 mAb based regimens or as monotherapy revealed low antibody responses (n = 84;seropositivity 22.6%;median titer < 0.8 U/mL;Q1-Q3 [ < 0.8-< 0.8]). On analysis of indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas whereby antiCD-20 mAb are often incorporated, treatment proximity to 2V impacted responses: < 3 months (n = 33;22%;< 0.8 U/ mL;[ < 0.8-< 0.8]) vs. 12-24 months (n = 4;60%;228 U/mL;[ < 0.8-232]). In contrast, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (n = 38;100%;858 U/mL;[221-> 2499]), proteosome inhibitor monotherapy (n = 4;100%;median titer 1520 U/mL;[462-> 2499]) were among the subgroups with the highest numerical responses, however, the addition of corticosteroids impacted vaccine response as seen in proteosome inhibitor with corticosteroids (n = 7;85.7%;6.6 U/mL;[1.8-115.2]). Conclusions: The humoral response from our single institution cohort identifies diminished responses depending on treatment status and the type of treatment including the proximity of treatment exposure to receipt of vaccination. Furthermore, vaccine boosters can induce antibody responses in patients who were previously seronegative.
ABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus-2 has profound effects on patients (pts) with Multiple myeloma (MM). At the beginning of the pandemic, COVID-19 infection resulted an overall mortality around 54% (cook et al. BMJ 2020). Here, we report an updated morbidity and fatality for MM. Methods: After obtaining IRB approvals from each participating institute, retrospectively, between January 1, 2021 and August 30, 2021, we identified pts with MM and COVID-19 in two myeloma centers (Levine Cancer Institute (LCI) & the University of Kansas medical center (KUMC). Results: We identified 162 MM pts who had COVID- 19 (LCI n=132, UKMC n=30), including 57% males, with median age of 64 years. Current or former smoking reported in 40% of pts. Most pts have associated comorbid conditions: hypertension (45%), hypogammaglobulinemia (32%), CKD (30%), DM (22%), obesity (16.6%), CHF (14%), and CAD (13.5%). Within 3 months prior to infection, treatment included immunomodulatory combinations in 35%, proteasome inhibitors in 28 %, and Daratumumab in 26.5%. Symptoms are summarized in table. 69% had Mild symptoms (no need for hospitalization), 20 % had moderate symptoms (requiring hospitalization), and 9.8% had severe symptoms (ICU level of care). The 18% of pts required oxygen: 6 pts required invasive oxygenation and 3 pts needed vasopressors. The 32% of pts had RRMM, 29.5% on maintenance, and 12% was getting induction. Regarding MM response: >VGPR in 45% and PD in 18%. The 78 pts had ASCT prior to COVID-19 infection: only 3 pts < 1 year and 3 pts < 6 months. MM response or ASCT did not affect hospitalization or mortality.The case fatality rate (CFR) was 6%. In the univariate analysis, CKD, DM, HTN and hepatic dysfunction were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization. However, in multivariate analysis, only CKD, hepatic dysfunction, and Hypogammaglobulinemia significantly increased the risk of admission with only age and lymphopenia were associated with increased COVID-19 related fatatlity. Conclusions: With implementation of center-specific disease control measures and universal screening, pts might have lower case severity and fatality rate than was initially reported.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM), an age-dependent neoplasm of antibody-producing plasma cells, have compromised immune systems due to multiple factors that may increase the risk of severe COVID-19. The NCATS' National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) is a centralized data resource representing the largest multi-center cohort of ∼12M COVID-19 cases and controls nationwide. In this study, we aim to analyze risk factors associated with COVID-19 severity and death in MM patients using the N3C database. Methods: Our cohort included MM patients within the N3C registry diagnosed with COVID-19 based on positive PCR or antigen tests or ICD-10-CM. The outcomes of interest include all-cause mortality (including discharge to hospice) during the index encounter, and clinical indicators of severity (hospitalization/ED visit, use of mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/ECMO). Results: As of 09/10/2021, the N3C registry included 690371 cancer patients, out of which 17791 were MM patients (4707 were COVID-19+). The mean age at diagnosis was 65.9yrs, 57.6% were >65yo, 46.4% were females, and 21.8% were Blacks. 25.6% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score of ≥2. 55.6% required an inpatient or ED visit, and 3.65% required invasive ventilation. 11.4% developed acute kidney injury during hospitalization. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed histories of pulmonary disease (OR 2.2;95%CI: 1.7-2.8), renal disease (OR 1.8;95%CI: 1.4-2.4), and black race (p<0.001) were associated with higher risk of severity. Interestingly, smoking status was significantly associated with a lower risk of severity (OR 0.7;95%CI: 0.5-0.9). Further, protective association was also observed between COVID-19 severity and blood or marrow transplant (BMT) (OR 0.52;95%CI: 0.4-0.7), daratumumab therapy (OR 0.64;95%CI: 0.42- 0.99) and COVID-19 vaccination (OR 0.28;95%CI: 0.18-0.44). IMiDs were associated increase in the risk of COVID-19 severity (OR 2.1;95%CI: 1.6-2.7). 2.3% of N3C-myeloma COVID-19+ patients died within the first 10 days, while 4.95% died within 30 days of COVID-19 hospitalization. Overall, the survival probability was 90.5% across the course of the study. Multivariate cox proportional hazard model showed that CCI score ≥2 (HR 4.4;95%CI: 2.2-8.8), hypertension (HR 1.6;95%CI: 1.02- 2.4), IMiD (HR 2.6;95%CI: 1.8-3.8) and proteasome inhibitor (HR 1.6;95%CI: 1.1-2.5) therapy were associated with worse survival. COVID-19 vaccination (HR 0.195;95%CI: 0.09-0.45) and BMT (HR 0.65;95%CI: 0.4-0.995) were associated with lower risk of death. Conclusions: We have identified previously unpublished potential risk factors for COVID-19 severity and death in MM as well as validated some published ones. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest nationwide study on multiple myeloma patients with COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy expressing two B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting, single-domain antibodies. The multicohort, open-label, phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 study (NCT04133636) is assessing cilta-cel in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) under various clinical settings and evaluating the suitability of outpatient administration. Updated results of CARTITUDE-2 cohort A are presented here. Methods: Cohort A pts had progressive MM after 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT;included proteasome inhibitor [PI] and immunomodulatory drug [IMiD]), were lenalidomide-refractory, and had no previous exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. A single cilta-cel infusion at a target dose of 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg was given 5-7 d after start of lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide [300 mg/m2] and fludarabine [30 mg/m2] for 3 d). The primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5 at any time point. Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), time and duration of MRD negativity, and incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Response was assessed per International Myeloma Working Group criteria and AEs were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (cytokine release syndrome [CRS] and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS] by American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy). Results: As of April 15, 2021 (median follow-up of 9.7 mo), 20 pts (65% men;median age 60 y [range 38-75]) received cilta-cel, with 1 pt treated in an outpatient setting. Pts had a median of 2 prior LOT (range 1-3);60% had 1-2 prior LOT and 40% had 3 prior LOT. All pts were exposed to a PI, IMiD, and dexamethasone;95% were exposed to alkylating agents and 65% to daratumumab. 95% of pts were refractory to last LOT;40% were triple-class refractory. ORR was 95% (95% CI 75.1-99.9);85% (95% CI 62.1-96.8) had ≥complete response (CR), and 95% (95% CI 75.1-99.9) had ≥very good partial response (Figure). Median time to first response was 1.0 mo (range 0.7-3.3) and median time to ≥CR was 2.6 mo (range 0.9-7.9). Median DOR was not reached;progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 mo was 90% (95% CI 65.6-97.4). Of 13 MRD-evaluable pts, 92.3% (95% CI 64.0-99.8) were MRD-negative at 10-5. Hematologic AEs (≥20% of pts) were neutropenia (95%;grade [gr] 3/4: 95%), thrombocytopenia (80%;gr 3/4: 35%), anemia (75%;gr 3/4: 45%), lymphopenia (65%;gr 3/4: 60%) and leukopenia (55%;gr 3/4: 55%). 95% of pts had CRS (gr 3/4: 10%);median time to onset was 7 d (range 5-9) and median duration was 4 d (range 2-11). Four pts (20%) had CAR-T neurotoxicity (all gr 1/2). Three pts (15%) had ICANS (all gr 1/2);median time to onset was 8 d (range 7-10) and median duration was 3 d (range 1-3). One pt had facial paralysis (gr 2) with time to onset of 29 d and duration of 51 d. No movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported. One death due to COVID-19 was assessed as treatment-related. Safety was manageable in the pt treated in an outpatient setting. Conclusions: A single cilta-cel infusion led to early and deep responses in pts with MM who had 1-3 prior LOT and were lenalidomide-refractory. No movement and neurocognitive TEAEs occurred, suggesting successful implementation of monitoring and pt management strategies across phase 2/3 studies in the CARTITUDE program.
ABSTRACT
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy expressing two B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting, singledomain antibodies. The multicohort, open-label, phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 study (NCT04133636) is evaluating ciltacel in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) in various clinical settings and assessing the suitability of outpatient administration. Updated results from CARTITUDE-2 cohort A are presented here. Cohort A pts had progressive MM after 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT;included proteasome inhibitor [PI] and immunomodulatory drug [IMiD]), were lenalidomide-refractory, and had no previous exposure to agents targeting BCMA. A single cilta-cel infusion at a target dose of 0.75 × 106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg was given 5-7 days after start of lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide [300 mg/m2 ] and fludarabine [30 mg/m2 ] for 3 days). The primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10 -5 at any time point. Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), time and duration of MRD negativity and adverse events (AEs). Response was assessed by International Myeloma Working Group criteria and AEs were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (cytokine release syndrome [CRS] and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS] by American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy). As of April 15, 2021 (median follow-up 9.7 months), 20 pts (65% men;median age 60 years [range 38-75]) received ciltacel, with 1 pt treated in an outpatient setting. Pts had a median of two prior LOT (range 1-3);60% with 1-2 prior LOT and 40% with three prior LOT. All pts were exposed to a PI, IMiD and dexamethasone;95% were exposed to alkylating agents and 65% to daratumumab. 95% of pts were refractory to last LOT;40% were triple-class refractory. ORR was 95% (95% CI 75.1-99.9);85% (95% CI 62.1-96.8) had ≥complete response (CR), and 95% (95% CI 75.1-99.9) had ≥very good partial response. The median time to first response was 1.0 months (range 0.7-3.3) and the median time to ≥CR was 2.6 months (range 0.9-7.9). The median DOR was not reached;progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months was 90% (95% CI 65.6-97.4). Of MRD-evaluable pts ( n = 13), 92.3% (95% CI 64.0-99.8) were MRD-negative at 10 -5 . Haematological AEs (≥20% of pts) were neutropenia (95%;grade [gr] 3/4: 95%), thrombocytopenia (80%;gr 3/4: 35%), anaemia (75%;gr 3/4: 45%), lymphopenia (65%;gr 3/4: 60%) and leukopenia (55%;gr 3/4: 55%). Ninety-five percent of pts had CRS (gr 3/4: 10%);median time to onset was 7 days (range 5-9) and median duration was 4 days (range 2-11). Four pts (20%) had CAR-T neurotoxicity (all gr 1/2). Three pts (15%) had ICANS (all gr 1/2);median time to onset was 8 days (range 7-10) and median duration was 3 days (range 1-3). One pt had facial paralysis (gr 2) with time to onset of 29 days and duration of 51 days. No movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred. One death occurred due to COVID-19 (assessed as treatment-related). Safety was manageable in the pt treated in an outpatient setting. Lenalidomide-refractory pts with MM and 1-3 prior LOT showed early and deep responses with a single cilta-cel infusion. No movement and neurocognitive TEAEs were reported, suggesting utilisation of successful monitoring and pt management strategies across phase 2/3 studies in the CARTITUDE program.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Cilta-cel is a CAR-T cell therapy that expresses 2 BCMA-targeting single-domain antibodies, designed to confer avidity. In the multicohort, phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 study (NCT04133636), the safety and efficacy of cilta-cel in various clinical settings and suitability of outpatient administration was explored in patients with multiple myeloma. Material and methods: Patients enrolled in Cohort A had progressive MM after 1–3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), were lenalidomide refractory, and were naïve to BCMA-targeting agents. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose: 0.75 × 106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was given 5–7 days after start of lymphodepletion (daily cyclophosphamide [300 mg/m2] and fludarabine [30 mg/m2] for 3 days). The primary outcome was minimal residual disease (MRD) 10-5 negativity. Secondary outcomes were response rates (per IMWG criteria) and safety (per CTCAE;CRS and ICANS by ASTCT). Results: As of the February 2021 data cutoff (median follow-up: 5.8 months [2.5–9.8]), 20 patients (65% male;median age 60 years [38–75]) received cilta-cel;1 patient was treated in an outpatient setting. Patients (n = 12: <3 prior LOT;n = 8: 3 prior LOT) received a median of 2 (1–3) prior LOT. All patients were exposed to PI, IMiD, and dexamethasone, 95% to alkylating agents, and 65% to daratumumab. The majority (95%) were refractory to the last LOT;40% were triple-class refractory. Overall response rate was 95% (95% CI: 75–100), 75% (95% CI: 51–91) achieved stringent CR/CR, and 85% (95% CI: 62–97) achieved ≥VGPR. Median time to first response was 1.0 month (0.7–3.3);median time to best response was 1.9 month (0.9–5.1). Median duration of response was not reached. All patients (n = 4) with MRD-evaluable samples at 10-5 at data cutoff were MRD-negative. Hematologic AEs ≥20% were neutropenia (95%;grade 3/4: 90%), thrombocytopenia (80%;grade 3/4: 35%), anemia (65%;grade 3/4: 40%), lymphopenia (60%;grade 3/4: 55%), and leukopenia (55%;all grade 3/4). 85% of patients had CRS;10% were grade 3/4. Median time to CRS onset was 7 days (5–9), with a median duration of 3.5 days (2–11). CAR-T cell neurotoxicity occurred in 20% of patients (all grade 1/2). Three patients had ICANS (n = 1: grade 1;n = 2: grade 2);median time to onset was 8 days (7–11) and median duration was 2 days (1–2). One patient had grade 2 facial paralysis;time to onset was 29 days with a duration of 51 days. One death occurred due to Covid-19 (assessed as treatment-related by investigator). The safety profile was manageable in the patient who was treated in an outpatient setting. Discussion: Updated efficacy and safety findings will inform suitability of outpatient treatment in this and other cohorts of CARTITUDE-2 as well as the CARTITUDE-4 study. Conclusion: A single cilta-cel infusion at the recommended phase 2 dose led to early and deep responses with a manageable safety profile in patients with MM who had 1–3 prior LOT.
ABSTRACT
It is well established that COVID-19 carries a higher risk of morbidity and mortality in patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies. Emerging data suggests that despite the 3 COVID-19 vaccines with emergency use authorization (EUA) by the FDA inducing high levels of immunity in the general population, pts with hematologic malignancies have lower rates of seroconversion for the SARS-CoV-2 Spike antibody (Spike IgG) and thus possibly lower protection against severe COVID-19. We established a program of rapid vaccination and evaluation of response in an inner city minority population to help determine the factors that contribute to the poor seroconversion to COVID-19 vaccination in pts with hematologic malignancies. We conducted a cross-sectional cohort study of pts with hematologic malignancies seen at Montefiore Medical Center between March 29, 2021 and July 8, 2021 who completed their vaccination series with 1 of the 3 FDA EUA COVID-19 vaccines, Moderna, Pfizer, or Johnson & Johnson (J&J). We qualitatively measured Spike IgG production in all pts using the AdviseDx Spike IgG assay and performed quantitative analysis on pts who completed their vaccination series with at least 14 days (d) after the 2 nd dose of the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines or 28d after the single J&J vaccine. Safety data was collected via questionnaires or as part of the electronic medical record. We analyzed the characteristics of these pts using standard descriptive statistics and associations between pts characteristics, cancer subtypes, treatments, and vaccine response using a Fisher Exact test, Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum test, or Kendall Tau-b test. A total of 121 pts with hematologic malignancies were enrolled and another 10 pts were included by retrospective chart review. Five pts did not have a Spike IgG performed after consent and excluded. Ten patients had Spike IgG testing before completion of their vaccination series and excluded from quantitative analyses. A total of 116 pts were included in immunogenicity analysis and 106 pts in quantitative analysis. Baseline characteristics and representative malignancies are listed in Table 1. Seventy pts (60%) received Pfizer, 36 pts (31%) Moderna, and 10 pts (9%) J&J. Median time from vaccination completion to Spike IgG was 40d. We observed a high-rate of seropositivity (86%) with 16 pts (14%) having a negative Spike IgG. Percent positivity was not statistically significant between vaccine types (p=0.50). We observed significantly lower seroconversion rates in pts with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (p=0.005) and pts who received: cytotoxic chemotherapy (p=0.002), IVIG (p=0.01), CAR-T cell therapy (p=0.00002), and CD20 monoclonal antibodies (Ab) (p=0.0000008) especially within 6 mo of Spike Ab evaluation (p=0.01). All pts who received anti-CD19 (Axi-cel) CAR-T therapy (0/6) were seronegative, and 1 pt that received BCMA directed CAR-T (Cilta-cel) was seropositive with no association between timing CAR-T cell infusion and seroconversion/titer. Use of BCL2 inhibitors (p=0.04), CD20 monoclonal Ab (p=0.0009), CAR-T cell therapy (p=0.01), BTK inhibitors (p=0.04), current steroid use (p=0.002), and IVIG (p=0.003) also correlated with significantly lower Ab titers with a trend toward lower Ab titers in pts on any active cancer therapy at time of vaccination (p=0.051). Immunomodulatory drugs (p=0.01) and proteasome inhibitors (p=0.01) had significantly higher seroconversion rates, and pts with history prior COVID-19 (12/106) had significantly higher Ab titers (p=0.0003). Of 47 pts who received stem cell transplant, 43 received an autologous (37 seropositive, 6 seronegative) and 4 an allogeneic transplant (3 seropositive, 1 seronegative), with no significant association with seroconversion, Ab titer, or time since transplant (greater or less than 1 year). The majority of pts, 64% and 53%, reported no adverse effects (AE) to the 1 st and 2 nd dose respectively. The most common AE were mild in severity and included sore arm, muscle aches, fatigue, and fever. No life-threatening AE were observed. Our findings indicate hat vaccination is safe, effective, and well tolerated in the majority of pts with hematologic malignancies. We observed that pts receiving B-cell depleting therapies are unable to mount an effective serological response to COVID-19 vaccines and remain vulnerable to the disease. Novel immunization strategies (active or passive) are urgently needed in this population. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Gritsman: iOnctura: Research Funding. Shastri: Onclive: Honoraria;Kymera Therapeutics: Research Funding;Guidepoint: Consultancy;GLC: Consultancy. Halmos: Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;AbbVie: Research Funding;Boehringer-Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;GSK: Research Funding;Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Mirati: Research Funding;Elevation: Research Funding;Blueprint: Research Funding;Advaxis: Research Funding;Eli-Lilly: Research Funding;TPT: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Apollomics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Guardant Health: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Verma: BMS: Research Funding;GSK: Research Funding;Novartis: Consultancy;Stelexis: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company;Eli Lilly: Research Funding;Curis: Research Funding;Medpacto: Research Funding;Incyte: Research Funding;Acceleron: Consultancy;Stelexis: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company;Celgene: Consultancy;Throws Exception: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.
ABSTRACT
mRNA vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA1273 are highly effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality in healthy adults. However, their immunogenicity in immunocompromised Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients is less clear. We performed an observational prospective study of 96 MM patients (pts) treated at our centre, aimed at assessing the humoral and cell-mediated immune (CMI) response following the full immunization schedule. To this aim, we measured serum levels of neutralizing IgG anti Spike-protein (IgG anti S-RBD) at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the 2 nd dose of vaccination, using the electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) platform (Elecsys® Anti-sars-Cov-2 ECLIA assay) and evaluated CMI response in terms of pts with a SARS-CoV-2 specific IFNγ T cell response by IGRA (Interferon-Gamma Release Assays) test at 3 and 12 months after 2 nd dose. A concentration level of IgG anti S-RBD ≥0.80 U/ml was considered a seropositive result. Herein, we report preliminary data on the development of humoral response in 96 MM pts who reached the first study timepoint (1 month after 2 nd dose), compared to 54 health-care workers as controls. At vaccination, the median age of the 96 patients (51 males/45 females) was 66.5 (range 47-83) years. The median number of previous lines of therapy was 1 (range 1-11) and only 7 (7.3%) pts were not receiving active treatment. 44.8% (n=43) pts had relapse/refractory MM. Among 72 (75%) transplant-eligible pts, 63 patients had previously received autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) with a median time between ASCT and vaccine of 31 (range 3-274) months. 70 (72.9%) pts had received immunomodulatory drugs (IMIDs) containing regimens, 30 (31.3%) proteasome inhibitors (PIs), 11 (11.5%) IMIDs + PIs, 32 (33.3%) anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD38 moAbs). 33 (34.4%) pts were in lenalidomide (R) maintenance therapy. At vaccination, 67 (68.8%) pts were in VGPR or higher, 18 (18.7%) in PR and 11 (11.3%) in SD or PD. Immunoparesis (≥1 uninvolved Ig below lower level limit) was observed in 78 (88.6%) pts, of whom 59 (67.1%) showed a reduction of two Ig classes. All pts had completed the 2 planned doses of BNT162b2 (40.6%) or mRNA1273 (59.4%) vaccine 3 or 4 weeks apart, respectively. Control cohort (n=54;median age of 51 [range 40-66] years) received mRNA vaccine during the same period. People with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (positive IgG anti S-RBD or anti-nucleocapsid N antibody titer before vaccines) were excluded from the analysis. At 1 month post 2 nd dose, (median 30 days, IQR 28-32) seropositive response rate to vaccination was 91.7% (n=88) for MM pts vs 100% for controls, p=0.05;the median IgG anti S-RBD titer was 435 (range 0.4-2500) vs 1040.5 U/ml (range 160-2500), respectively;p=0.008. No difference in the rate of seropositive response between those who received the 2 type of vaccines was found (p=0.09). Pts with response level ≥ CR had a median antibody (Ab) titer (1242 U/ml, range 0.4-2500) significantly higher than those with ≤CR (221.5 U/ml, range 0.4- 2500), p<0.001. Pts receiving PI (median Ab titer 156;range 0.4- 2500) and anti-CD38 MoAbs (median titer 265 U/ml;0.4- 2500) containing regimens had a lower Ab titer than all the other pts (p=0.003 and p<0.001, respectively). Median Ab titer was higher in pts who received ASCT vs others (1042, range 0.4- 2500 vs 160 U/ml, range 228-2500, p<0.001) and in pts receiving R maintenance (1681.2, range 0.4-2500 vs 529.5 U/ml, range 0.4-2500, p<0.001). In pts with 2-Ig immunoparesis, the median Ab titer was 272 (range 0.4-2500) vs 2500 U/ml (range 228-2500) for no immunoparesis (p= 0.0037). A distribution analysis of the Ab titer revealed a significant correlation between better humoral response and hematological response ≥ CR (p<0.001), being in first-line treatment (p=0.039), having received ASCT (p=0.001) and receiving R maintenance (p=0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed ≥ CR [OR 2.54, 95% CI 93-756], being in first line treatment [OR 2.10, CI 22-722] and R maintenance therapy [OR 4.53, CI 484-1233] as independen predictors of better humoral response at 1 month after 2 nd vaccine dose. In conclusion, mRNA vaccines provided a high seropositivity rate in pts in active MM treatment, with a better humoral response in pts achieving CR, those who received ASCT and receiving R maintenance. Immunoparesis was confirmed to be an unfavourable factor for the development of humoral response, as well as treatment with anti-CD-38 moAbs. Disclosures: Mancuso: Celgene: Honoraria;Takeda: Honoraria;Sanofi: Honoraria;Amgen: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria. Zamagni: Takeda: Honoraria;Amgen: Honoraria;Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria. Pantani: Amgen: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria. Rocchi: Amgen: Honoraria;GalxoSmithKline: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria. Rizzello: Amgen: Honoraria;GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria;Sanofi: Honoraria. Tacchetti: Amgen: Honoraria;BMS/Celgene: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria;Takeda: Honoraria;AbbVie: Honoraria;Sanofi: Honoraria;GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria;Oncopeptides: Honoraria. Zinzani: JANSSEN-CILAG: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau;MSD: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau;SANDOZ: Other: Advisory board;TG Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau;GILEAD: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau;SERVIER: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau;BMS: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau;CELLTRION: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau;TAKEDA: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau;ROCHE: Other, Speakers Bureau;EUSAPHARMA: Consultancy, Other, Speakers Bureau;KYOWA KIRIN: Other, Speakers Bureau;Incyte: Other, Speakers Bureau;NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Other, Speakers Bureau;ADC Therap.: Other;Beigene: Other, Speakers Bureau;VERASTEM: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau. Cavo: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Accommodations, Speakers Bureau;AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Bristol-Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.
ABSTRACT
Case Report Introduction Plasma cell leukemia is very rare and an aggressive form of leukemia with a poor prognosis. Interim analysis of a phase II trial (EMN12/HOVON 129) using carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) in patients with PCL ≤65 years showed a very good partial response or greater response in 80% with 33% achieving at least a complete response. Carfilzomib (Kyprolis TM) is a proteosome inhibitor and is associated with ARDS and acute respiratory failure in 2% of the cases per FDA package insert. We present a case report of acute respiratory distress syndrome presumed to be potentiated 2/2 to carfilzomib infusion. Case A 58-year-old male with a history of hypertension, recent COVID-19 infection and new diagnosis of untreated Plasma Cell Leukemia presented to our hospital with worsening chest pain, fatigue and dyspnea. Vitals on admission were notable for BP 158/88, HR 101, Tmax 99F and sating 100% on room air. Peripheral blood exam showed WBC: 27.7 x109/L, Hb: 8 gm/dl, platelet: 121000, corrected calcium: 13.3 mg/dl, creatinine: 1.16 mg/dl, total protein:11 g/ dl, uric acid: 8.2 mg/dl, B-2 micro globulin: 5.8 mg/L, Mspike: 5.6 g/dl;IgA lambda type. CT Chest abdomen pelvis revealed diffuse lytic bone lesions. Due to inability to obtain bone marrow biopsy from limited resources after Hurricane Ida and aggressive nature of the cancer, treatment was initiated based off a previous flow cytometry from the peripheral blood which showed 55% plasma cells. Patient started on chemotherapy with Cyclophosphamide, Carfilzomib, and dexamethasone with plans to change to Revlimid from cycle 2. He was also started on fluid hydration and Zometa for hypercalcemia. Patient also received aggressive blood pressure control with metoprolol, amlodipine and IV labetalol as needed. After 2nd dose of Kyprolis, he developed acute hypoxic respiratory distress and was initiated on Bipap. Chest Xray was concerning for fluid overload and/or evolving pneumonia. He was supported with diuretics and broad-spectrum antibiotics;however, he eventually was intubated. He was also started on high dose steroids. Repeat CT chest was negative for thrombosis, but showed extensive bilateral pleural -parenchymal opacities. He had a bronchoalveolar lavage with no obvious infection. Over the next 2 days, patient showed improvement and eventually self-extubated. After his recovery, we continued chemotherapy with Kyprolis and he has tolerated it without issues. Discussion The etiology of ARDS is likely multifactorial, however Kyprolis may have played a major role in his decompensation mainly due to the timing and known side effects of the medication. Based on a study from 2018, only 5 case reports of Kyprolis-associated non-infectious progressive lung injury were found at that time. Clinicians should be mindful of Kyprolis induced lung injury and emphasize the need for tight blood pressure control and careful administration of intravenous fluids to decrease the possibility of lung injury.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Despite recent advances, MM remains incurable and new therapeutic options are needed, particularly for pts with RRMM. IBER is a novel, potent oral cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD ®) compound with enhanced tumoricidal and immune-stimulatory effects compared with immunomodulatory (IMiD ®) agents. Preclinically, IBER demonstrated marked synergy with DEX and with other standard myeloma treatments. CC-220-MM-001 (NCT02773030) is an ongoing phase 1/2 study evaluating IBER with different treatment combinations in independent cohorts of pts with RRMM;in phase 1, the recommended phase 2 dose of IBER, when given in combination with DEX, was determined at 1.6 mg (Lonial S, et al. Blood 2019;134[suppl 1]:3119). Here we report results from the dose expansion of IBER + DEX in pts with heavily pretreated, triple-class exposed (including ≥ 1 IMiD agent, ≥ 1 proteasome inhibitor [PI], and ≥ 1 anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody [mAb]) RRMM. Methods: Eligible pts had RRMM;had received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, including lenalidomide (LEN), pomalidomide (POM), a PI, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 mAb;had experienced disease progression within 60 days of last myeloma therapy;and were refractory to an IMiD agent, a PI, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 mAb. Pts with central nervous system involvement were not eligible. Pts who had received prior anti-BCMA therapy were excluded, but included in a supportive cohort for safety and preliminary efficacy assessment. IBER (1.6 mg) was given orally on days (D) 1-21, in combination with DEX (40 mg;20 mg if > 75 years of age) on D1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle. Thrombo-embolism prophylaxis was mandatory for all pts. Primary objective was to determine efficacy expressed as overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included additional efficacy and safety assessments. Exploratory endpoints included evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Results: As of June 2, 2021, 107 pts had received IBER + DEX. Median age was 64 (44-83) years;median time since initial diagnosis was 6.9 (1.6-24.5) years. Extramedullary plasmacytomas were present in 25.2% of pts;29.9% of pts had high-risk cytogenetics. Median number of prior regimens was 6 (3-23). All pts were triple-class exposed;prior therapies included autologous stem cell transplantation (78.5%), PIs (100%), IMiD agents (LEN [100%] and POM [100%]), and anti-CD38 mAbs (100%);99.1% of pts were refractory to last myeloma regimen and 97.2% of pts were triple-class refractory. Median follow-up was 7.69 (0.5-17.5) months, with a median number of 4 (1-17) cycles received and 13 (12.1%) pts continuing treatment. Main reason for discontinuation was progressive disease (69.2%). ORR was 26.2%, with 1 (0.9%) stringent complete response, 8 (7.5%) very good partial responses, and 19 (17.8%) partial responses (Table);the clinical benefit rate (≥ minimal response) was 36.4% and disease control rate (≥ stable disease) was 79.4%. Median duration of response was 7.0 (4.5-11.3) months (Table), median progression-free survival was 3.0 (2.8-3.7) months, and median overall survival was 11.2 (9.0-not reached) months. Similar response rates were observed among a cohort of pts also exposed to BCMA therapies (N = 24, Table). Grade (Gr) 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 88 (82.2%) pts. Most frequent (≥ 20% pts) hematologic Gr 3-4 TEAEs were neutropenia (44.9%;and 4.7% febrile neutropenia), anemia (28.0%), thrombocytopenia (21.5%), and leukopenia (20.6%). Gr 3-4 infections were reported in 27.1% of pts;Gr 3-4 pneumonia and COVID-19 occurred in 10.3% and 4.7% of pts, respectively. Occurrence of other Gr 3-4 non-hematologic TEAEs was generally low, including gastrointestinal disorders (5.6%), fatigue (2.8%), rash (1.9%). Fifty-six (52.3%) pts and 20 (18.7%) had IBER dose interruptions and reductions due to TEAEs, respectively. Five (4.7%) pts discontinued due to TEAEs. No pt discontinued IBER due to neutropenia. Overall, HRQoL was maintained in these pts. Conclusions: IBER + DEX demonst ated promising efficacy in pts with heavily pretreated, triple-class exposed and refractory RRMM, as well as in pts who had previously received anti-BCMA therapy;this combination was generally well tolerated and TEAEs were manageable with dose reductions and interruptions. These results support the further development of IBER in MM, including phase 3 trials in combination regimens. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Lonial: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria;AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Merck: Honoraria;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Popat: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, and Celgene: Consultancy;Takeda: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES;AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Oncopeptides, and Amgen: Honoraria;Janssen and BMS: Other: travel expenses. Hulin: Sanofi: Honoraria;Celgene/BMS: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria;Takeda: Honoraria;abbvie: Honoraria. Jagannath: Legend Biotech: Consultancy;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy;Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy;Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy. Oriol: Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding;Regeneron: Consultancy;AbbVie: Consultancy;Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy;Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Secura Bio: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy;AstraZeneca: Consultancy;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weisel: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Roche: Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Abbvie: Consultancy;Novartis: Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria. Minnema: Cilag: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Alnylam: Consultancy;Celgene: Other: Travel expenses;Kite/Gilead: Consultancy;BMS: Consultancy. Badros: J&J: Research Funding;Janssen: Research Funding;BMS: Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Knop: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy;Oncopeptides: Consultancy;Pfizer: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultanc . Stadtmauer: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria;Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Nguyen: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Amin: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Kueenburg: Celgene a BMS company: Current Employment. Peluso: Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Current Employment. van de Donk: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding;Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding;Cellectis: Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy;Roche: Consultancy;Novartis /bayer/servier: Consultancy.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite the development of new therapeutic agents, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is associated with poor survival outcomes. Furthermore, many patients develop resistance to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), creating a need for IMiD-free regimens. Areas covered: This review focuses on the combination of carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab (KdD or DKd) which has shown promising results in patients with RRMM who have tried multiple lines of therapy, and has been approved in the U.S., EU, and Japan. The KdD triplet has two recommended dosage regimens, carfilzomib once-weekly (KdD70 QW) and carfilzomib twice-weekly (KdD56 BIW), with comparable efficacy and safety profiles. Expert opinion: These options provide flexibility to patients and healthcare providers, especially in the era of COVID-19. Carfilzomib-based regimens remain a standard of care based on multiple randomized phase 3 studies. Additional studies are currently underway investigating carfilzomib-based regimens such as KdD combined with novel agents. Nevertheless, KdD is one of the most efficacious options for patients with RRMM.